Hard times lead to an increase in disputes over wills

18I08I09

 

Hard times lead to an increase in disputes over Wills


 

In these difficult financial times the incidence of disputes over estates when people die is likely to increase.  That is certainly borne out by statistics on the High Court’s workload for 2007 which reveal that inheritance disputes jumped by 330% and contentious probate actions by 153% in just 12 months.

 

In another recent decision which highlights this increase, the High Court has set aside the Will of a wealthy philanthropist who left her substantial estate to the son of her carer, to the total exclusion of her family.

 

In reaching the decision in the case, Deputy High Court Judge Sarah Asplin QC accepted the family’s argument that the Testatrix, Mrs Devas, who had suffered several strokes and was ill with dementia, could not have understood what the Will said.  As such, the Will was pronounced as invalid and an earlier Will dated 2002 (in which the family were named as beneficiaries) was reinstated.

 

The Court heard that in 1999, following the death of her husband, Mrs Devas moved from the Cotswolds to Cambridge to enjoy the city’s academic atmosphere.  Mrs Devas was a philanthropist and lover of reading who had previously provided funding for the establishment of the Panizzi Lectures on books at the British Library.

 

However, by 2003 Mrs Divas had suffered a series of strokes necessitating increasing amounts of care and a carer, Mrs Zandra Mackay, was hired to look after her.

 

In evidence, the family claimed that following the appointment of Mrs Mackay they were increasingly isolated from Mrs Divas to the extent that they were not told when she became gravely ill and were, in fact, prevented from seeing her in the last 48 hours of her life.

 

The Court also heard that Mrs Divas’ wealth was substantially diminished in the time between Mrs Mackay’s appointment and Mrs Divas’ subsequent death.  In particular, her cash wealth had been reduced from £665,000 to just £26,000 and, whilst some of that expenditure could be explained by care costs and day to day expenses, there were also various ‘large and unexplained gifts’ to Mrs Mackay and a Miss Atkinson, her secretary.

 

When Mrs Divas died it was discovered that a home made document purporting to be a Will had been executed in 2005 bequeathing the estate to Marcus Mackay, Mrs Mackay’s son.  The Court heard that, in fact, Mrs Divas barely knew Mr Mackay. 

 

The witnesses to the purported Will were Mrs Mackay and Mrs Atkinson and, within the terms of the Will, Mrs Divas’ family was expressly excluded in terms which included what was described as an ‘uncharacteristic attack’ on them.

 

Upon hearing all of the evidence the Judge ruled that the 2005 Will should not stand as valid and also that Mr Mackay must pay the legal costs of the family for the proceedings.  Moreover, the unexplained lifetime gifts are currently the subject of a criminal investigation with the papers soon to be placed before the Crown Prosecution Service.

 

The case once again highlights the fact that the Courts will take very seriously any allegation that a Will should not stand as valid.  Moreover, they are perfectly prepared to set a Will aside if the evidence suggests that a Testator lacked the mental capacity to understand its contents. 

 

It also demonstrates that the Court will pay close attention to all factors that could be seen as ‘suspicious’ such as the uncharacteristic exclusion of family members to the benefit of more peripheral figures in a Testator’s life and unexplained lifetime transactions.

 

It is always extremely important to seek expert advice when making a Will but that is particularly so in this increasingly litigious time.  It should be noted that the purported Will in the case mentioned above was a home made document. 

 

By seeking the advice of a solicitor a Testator will ensure that there is proper record of their reasons for making their Will in the terms that they have.  Moreover, their solicitor will take time to satisfy themselves that they have the requisite capacity to make a Will (however obvious that may seem) and that they are not being influenced in any way and make a record of that fact. 

 

The above case can be compared and contrasted with another recent case regarding the estate of a late Robert Perrins.  Mr Perrins suffered from multiple sclerosis and in his latter years had executed a Will bequeathing his estate to his carer with whom he had begun a relationship.  Upon Mr Perrin’s death the Will was challenged by his son who alleged that the Will was not properly executed and also that his father lacked sufficient testamentary capacity to execute it.  Upon considering all of the evidence, including, importantly, the fact that the deceased had had the contents of the Will explained to him by a solicitor, Lewison J concluded that Mr Perrins did in fact have the requisite capacity to execute the Will and it stood as valid.

 

Both of the above recent cases once again highlight the fact that Will disputes invariably live and die on contemporaneous third party evidence.  As such, solicitor’s records could just make the difference between a disputed Will standing as invalid or being disregarded. 

 

By seeking expert advice now a Testator can rest easy knowing that they have done all that they can to potentially head off future disputes over the validity of their Will and ensure that their wishes are honoured.

 

 

Contact

matthew evans new

Matthew Evans

Senior Associate

 

E Matthew.evans@hughjames.com

T 029 2066 0562

 

Design by Brand 68 Development by Fusionworkshop