Agents - Is your commission at risk?

29I07I09

Is your commission payment dependant on how the sale proceeds?

 


 

It is a long established principle that agents obtain commission from the seller upon completion of a transaction.  This is provided that the agents were the effective cause of the transaction.  This has been brought into severe doubt following a High Court ruling in Estafnous v London & Leeds Business Centres Ltd. 

 

The agent (Estafnous) entered into an agreement with the seller (London & Leeds Business Centres) whereby he would receive £2m commission upon introducing a buyer who then completes a successful sale.  The agent introduced London & Leeds to the buyer (Kapoor).   After some complications, Kapoor eventually acquired the building through a deal to buy the parent company London & Leeds.   The agent maintained that this entitled him to commission.  The judge concluded that the agent was not entitled to commission as the purchase was of the parent company, and not a simple deal for the building.

 

There are many reasons why the way in which a deal is structured may change.  Principally it is to save Stamp Duty Land Tax, and invariably culminates in a far more complex contract than originally anticipated.  However this does not alter the original perspective whereby the agent has introduced the seller to the buyer!

 

It may well be that this case will be appealed as it has some significant ramifications – even if just a point of principle.  Nonetheless, it would be prudent for agents to review their standard terms and conditions to ensure that commission entitlements are not impacted by the way a deal is structured.

 


For further information contact:

 

 

Peter Hurn colour

Contact

Peter Hurn

Partner

 

E peter.hurn@hughjames.com

T 029 2039 1122

Hugh James services

 

Design by Brand 68 Development by Fusionworkshop