The impact of removing legal aid for cases of clinician negligence

01 | 09 | 11

Bookmark and Share

Mari Rosser, partner in the clinical negligence team at Hugh James, has today spoken to the BBC giving her reaction to a case involving a   teenage girl from Newport who has recently recovered damages for medical negligence. The teenager (ST) was left paralysed from the waist down after undergoing surgery to remove gallstones. ST, who was 14 at the time , underwent surgery at the Birmingham Children's Hospital. After the procedure she  developed numbness in her legs and feet.  An MRI scan later indicated damage to the spinal cord membranes resulting in permanent paralysis. The damage had been caused by an epidural anaesthetic which was mistakenly left in place for more than two days.  

Mari Rosser said " This case is an example of how legal aid supported this family through a very difficult and complicated claim for damages. If the government's plans for removing clinical negligence from the scope for legal aid are implemented, patients like ST may not be able to access justice. The government envisages that cases will fall under a reformed "no- win no-fee" system. There is a danger,however, that lawyers will not be in a position to take on the more complicated cases under this system, leaving some of the most vulnerable people in society, including brain injured children, with no access to justice." 

Design by Brand 68 | Development by Fusionworkshop | SEO by Pinnacle Internet Marketing