Government reiterates that women with PIP breast implants do not need to have their implants removed

 Head of Litigation at Hugh James, Mark Harvey condemns Government’s lack of control over ‘powerful cosmetic industry’

06 | 01 | 12

Bookmark and Share

The Government announced on Friday 6 January that there is no need for routine removal of PIP breast implants. However, it continued to state that the NHS should pay for women who were fitted with these implants through the NHS and that it expected private clinics to follow suit. Renowned campaigning lawyer Mark Harvey, Partner and head of the top ranked personal injury team at Hugh James solicitors, is representing over 600 women with PIP implants of which over 300 have contacted Hugh James in the last two weeks. Reacting to the announcement Mark Harvey commented that

“The announcement is indecisive and sends out mixed messages to women across the UK affected by the PIP implants; it will be a big disappointment to our clients who have again been shown a complete lack of support and care from the Government and I know they will feel let down. On the one hand, they have recommended that the NHS should remove implants for concerned women if they have had their implants on the NHS, which we of course support. However, by only making a suggestion that the cosmetic industry should follow the example of the NHS then the Government again leaves women vulnerable. The announcement also suggests that the Government has no power to enforce this on the clinics; leaving this powerful cosmetic industry to their own devices. From our client’s experiences with many of these clinics to date, they have shown affected women no sympathy or support and we are extremely concerned that this announcement will again allow cosmetic clinics to leave women to try to sort out this serious problem alone. The announcement has gone against recommendations already made by the professionals of the review group who must have the most relevant expertise and this will again, as has been caused  already by the MHRA and the Government’s dealing of this scandal, cause greater uncertainty and concern for our clients. Worst of all it goes against what Mr Lansley was telling the clinics early this week, that they should be removing the implants”.

BAAPS President Fazel Fatah and a member of the review group advising the Government on this matter ahead of the announcement had commented that;

“some patients will prefer them removed as a preventative measure and this is an entirely rational approach in view of the quality issues associated with PIPs.”

The announcement was made following a Government review of the risks posed by faulty silicone breast implants after suggestions that more than 3,000 may be affected by these implants that were recalled in March 2010. Following contradictory data about the rupture rate of these implants, Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, announced last Saturday that there were fears that existing evidence about potential dangers was not reliable. The review was chaired by NHS medical director, Professor Sir Bruce Keogh.

The faulty PIP implants are the subject of a Medical Device Alert (MDA) by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), with a recall being issued on March 31 2010 for all UK implants over a year after Mr Harvey first alerted the MHRA to the problem. The implants were recalled following the discovery that the implants contained industrial silicone.

Mark Harvey will be continuing to pursue legal claims on behalf of his clients and will be making an application to the Court for a Group Litigation Order at the end of the month so that the legal issues may be dealt with by a Judge later this year. 

 

View our PIP news articles archive

For information on joining the group represented by Mark Harvey please contact Hugh James on 02920 224 871 or complete the enquiry form.

Design by Brand 68 | Development by Fusionworkshop | SEO by Pinnacle Internet Marketing