Court of Protection performance report

The Court of Protection published their first ever report recently summarising the Court’s performance between the introduction of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 on 1st October 2007 and 31st December 2009.

The Court of Protection is a specialist court which was established under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to make decisions on behalf of or appoint a Deputy to make those decisions for people who do not have the capacity to make those decisions themselves.

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 provides a legal framework for people who lack capacity and those people who make decisions on their behalf. It covers decisions about their personal welfare as well as their property and financial affairs and sets out the statutory principles which must be applied to ensure all decisions are made in the person’s best interests.

In a foreword to the report, Senior Judge Densil Lush commented “I cannot pretend that it has been plain sailing. The Court has had to endure more than its fair share of setbacks, which were caused in the main by a failure to anticipate, prior to the implementation of the Act, the volume of work that would inundate the court during the initial transitional period, and the overall burden it would place on the judges and staff.”

In addition to this, for the majority of the period reviewed – whereby it was identified that six Judges were required, the Court of Protection has had only three full time Judges to deal with the vast array of applications. Whilst regional District Judges were used to try to deal with some of the backlog it is hoped that the recent appointment of three additional fulltime judges should improve the position in the future. The report shows that, during the relevant period 1,672 complaints were received about the Court. Of these, 30% were due to “the length of the process and delays” and 15% were due to “administrative errors”.

The Court received 39,579 applications from October 2007 to December 2009 for the appointment of Property and Affairs Deputies. Of these applications, 31,063 orders were issued.

In comparison, the Court received fewer applications for personal welfare orders than the 2000 per annum it was expecting. In the 27 months reviewed by the report, 2,734 applications for health and welfare decisions were made and, of these, only 324 orders were issued. Out of the 324 orders issued, 195 appointed a health and welfare Deputy with the remaining orders being issue specific.

This reflects the Mental Capacity Act’s emphasis that “personal welfare applications should only be made as a last resort” and that “deputies for personal welfare decisions will only be required in the most difficult cases where:

  • important and necessary actions cannot be carried out without the court’s authority, or
  • there is no other way of settling the matter in the best interests of the person who lacks capacity to make personal welfare decisions.”

Senior Judge Lush agrees that the procedures of the Court have become “more bureaucratic and time-consuming than they used to be” and he anticipates that the review of the Court’s rules, forms and practice directions “will result in improvements in each of these respects”

In conclusion, we can see that since it’s inception on 1st October 2007 the Court has failed to provide the level of service its own targets or key performance indictors required. Changes are being made but only time will tell whether the new Court will be able to provide the efficient and user friendly service needed by its users.

Hugh James have a dedicated Court of Protection Unit headed by partner Andrew Harding. The team have years of specialist knowledge of the Court of Protection and its rules and procedures and understand the difficulties faced when decisions need to be made on behalf of a person who does not have the capacity to make those decisions for themselves.

Andrew Harding acts as Professional Deputy for a number of clients whose personal estate vary substantially in size. In addition, we provide advice and support to people wishing to make an application to the Court of Protection as well as existing Deputies.

The team have successfully obtained orders appointing health and welfare deputies and can advise families on the circumstances in which this may be required.

Andrew Harding is also a member of the Court of Protection’s Court User Group, which is a forum for consultation between the Court of Protection’s judges and both professional and lay deputies and Court users. The group meets quarterly to discuss issues and matters which may be causing concern and to provide views and comments on the Court’s policy issues.

If you would like more information on the Court of protection, Mental Capacity Act 2005 or the Hugh James Court of Protection unit please contact Kate Coles on 029 2039 1157 or kate.coles@hughjames.com.


Latest Tweets
@HughJamesLegal

Looking for a new career? Here is a list of our current vacancies https://t.co/ECm9jTKLEs https://t.co/BZ6oomnLlK 6 hours ago

hughjames.com/vacancies/
@HughJamesLegal

The Modern Slavery Act 2015: transparency of supply chains https://t.co/PbrgcgrVQQ https://t.co/wgH0xR3rbK 3 days ago

hughjames.com/news/comment/2…
@HughJamesLegal

We're looking for a paralegal to join our specialist PI department. See the full job discription here https://t.co/phVTmHgDNl 3 days ago

hughjames.com/vacancy/parale…
@HughJamesLegal

5G mobile masts – will they be on every home and lamppost? https://t.co/abJgubbpaN https://t.co/CslP8yMSvB 3 days ago

hughjames.com/news/comment/2…
@HughJamesLegal

Great to see comments from partner Tracey featured in the recent Raconteur supplement on Intellectual Property https://t.co/lhsBc8LDX0 3 days ago

twitter.com/raconteur/stat…
@HughJamesLegal

Here is how married couples and those going through a divorce will be affected by the recent stamp duty tax changes https://t.co/LUvuqWP0bQ 3 days ago

hughjames.com/news/comment/2…
@HughJamesLegal

As part of our series on the grounds for contesting a will we consider the lack of testamentary capacity https://t.co/VrUDBAaxPg 3 days ago

amp.twimg.com/v/22717b9d-6ba…
@HughJamesLegal

Case study: costs orders in an employment tribunal https://t.co/cZcNInSsaZ 4 days ago

hughjames.com/news/comment/2…
@HughJamesLegal

RT @LawyerHelenN: The @HughJamesLegal #london team are en route to @AvMAuk LSG at Hodge Jones Allen with @NyeMoloney attending too! #Semina… 4 days ago

@HughJamesLegal

Still in The Dark? – Continuing Healthcare and Dementia Awareness Week https://t.co/ZrPW8PuBBG 4 days ago

hughjames.com/news/comment/2…
@HughJamesLegal

Jason Thomas of @THOMAS_Rec shares his advice on what to do when faced with an IP dispute https://t.co/UyP6MwuYW2 https://t.co/5ToN6OHQUO 4 days ago

hughjames.com/news/spotlight…
Our Offices

Cardiff
Hodge House
114 - 116 St. Mary Street
Cardiff
CF10 1DY
Tel: 029 2022 4871
Fax: 029 2038 8222


Map and directions for Cardiff >

London
Temple Chambers
3-7 Temple Avenue
London
EC4Y 0DA
Tel: 020 7936 3453
Fax: 020 7936 3437


Map and directions for London >
Make an enquiry