BT hearing loss case studies
Case study one: Mr Keith Banwell
Case study two: Mr Malcolm Hill
Case study three: Mr D
Case study four: Mr H
Case study five: Mr E
Case study six: Mr K
Case study seven: Mr W
Case study eight: Mr P
Case study nine: Mr V
Case study ten: Mr F
Case study one: Mr Keith
Banwell
Former South Wales BT engineer
Keith Banwell has recovered compensation for damage to his hearing
caused by his work with BT who admitted that they had negligently
exposed him to excessive noise levels during his employment of over
20 years.
Keith, who is an ex Union elective
Secretary representative, based in Merthyr Tydfil and Pontypridd,
used a series of head tone sets throughout his employment with BT.
His work also took him to many noisy factories and industrial
sites. The head tone sets (also known as oscillators and amplifiers
with a probe), were used to locate wires in BT’s own network. His
hearing was damaged by the high-pitched noise that he listened to
over the headsets throughout the day.
Keith suffered a gradual
deterioration in his hearing which was first noticed by his family
when he would mishear what they were saying or not hear them at
all. He also suffers from tinnitus. He finds it difficult to follow
conversations in a group of people or where there is any background
noise.
Keith commented that "Hugh James
provided me with fast, efficient, professional and excellent
advice. I have recommended lots of my colleagues to Hugh James and
will continue to do so"
Hugh James currently represent many
past and present BT engineers who used this equipment. If you or
you know of others who also work or worked for BT and used this
equipment and you have hearing difficulty we may be able to assist
you.
Case study two: Mr Malcolm
Hill
Hugh James has successfully
recovered compensation on behalf of Mr Malcolm Hill from Merthyr
Tydfil.
Mr Hill was employed by BT for 32
years as a jointer and used a number of tone sets provided by BT to
enable him to identify tones in cables. Mr Hill brought a claim
against BT as a result of suffering hearing loss.
A medical examination revealed that
Mr Hill has a hearing loss caused by noise. BT admitted that they
had been negligent and agreed to settle Mr Hill’s claim.
Mr Hill comments that ;"I would
recommend that anyone who has a claim against BT goes to Hugh James
who dealt with my case swiftly and efficiently. I had no idea that
my hearing had been damaged by noise through the equipment that I
was given to use by BT to do my job."
Mr Hill’s claim is one in a number
of claim’s being pursued by Hugh James on behalf of current and
present BT engineers. At Hugh James we have a dedicated team
that specialises in dealing with Noise induced hearing loss claims
and recovering compensation for not only the injury but also any
appropriate treatment by way of hearing aids and tinnitus
treatment.
Case study three: Mr D
Mr D had worked for BT
for over 25 years as a Faults Maintenance Jointer. During his
employment he frequently used tone set equipment to locate cable
faults. Mr D approached Hugh James as he noticed that he was
missing parts of conversation with his family and friends and
constantly found that the volume of the television set was
high. Mr D was subsequently diagnosed with high frequency
sensory neural hearing loss and tinnitus caused by exposure to
noise.
Hugh James successfully
brought a claim against BT for damages as a result of Mr D’s injury
in the sum of £13,000.00, which included the costs of purchasing
hearing aids.
Case study four: Mr H
Mr H had worked for BT
for over ten years as a Telephone Engineer frequently using tone
set equipment throughout his time as an Installation Engineer and
Jointer. Unbeknown to Mr H his hearing was permanently
damaged as a result of being exposed to high levels of noise
through using the equipment. Mr H’s personal life was
affected in that he could not hear conversations properly when
there was background noise and he often could not hear the
telephone.
BT admitted exposing Mr H
to excessive noise that was likely to cause damage to his hearing
and Hugh James successfully recovered £12,000.00 in damages for Mr
H.
Case study five: Mr E
Mr E had noticed over the
last few years that his hearing was deteriorating and was worse
than men of his own age. He frequently missed parts of
conversation, particularly when there was background noise. He
would have difficulty hearing the telephone and his family would
often complain that the TV was on too loud.
Mr E had worked for BT
for over 30 years as a telephone engineer and jointer and was still
employed by them when he realised that there must have been
something else other than age which was affecting his hearing
loss.
During his employment Mr
E had frequently used a variety of tone sets and drills without
hearing protection. Hugh James arranged for Mr E to be medically
examined by a consultant who tested his hearing and was able to
confirm that Mr E’s hearing was considerably worse than other men
of his age and confirmed that the noise that he had been exposed to
during his employment had caused him to suffer a permanent hearing
loss. The expert advised that Mr E would also need hearing
aids.
BT admitted exposing Mr E
to excessive noise that was likely to cause damage to his hearing.
Hugh James successfully recovered £13,000.00 in damages for Mr E to
also enable him to purchase discreet hearing aids to help him
hear on a day to day basis.
Case study six: Mr K
Mr K had worn NHS hearing aids for
a number of years but had no idea that his hearing loss and
tinnitus could have been as a result of his employment with BT.
Mr K worked for BT for 29 years and
during that time he was exposed to noise levels that could harm his
hearing. He also worked in noisy factories carrying out work
for BT and was exposed to loud noise from his surroundings. Hugh
James arranged for Mr K’s hearing to be independently tested and he
was diagnosed as suffering with hearing loss caused by noise
exposure.
Mr K complained of difficulty
listening in places where there was background noise in groups of
people and would mis-hear parts of conversation. The
television volume was often too loud for other members of the
family. BT admitted exposing Mr K to excessive noise that was
likely to cause hearing loss and Hugh James successfully recovered
£10,000 in damages to also assist Mr K in purchasing private
hearing aids.
Case study seven: Mr W
Mr W from Derbyshire noticed his
hearing was deteriorating about 6 years ago. He found it difficult
to keep up with conversations and struggled to hear the television
and the telephone. He also suffers from tinnitus.
Mr W worked for BT for 12 years as
a Telephone Engineer frequently using tone set equipment to locate
pairs of wires within cables. He also worked in noisy environments
such as factories and telephone exchanges.
Mr W was never provided with any
hearing protection and he was totally unaware that his hearing was
being permanently damaged as a result of his work at BT. Mr W was
subsequently diagnosed with high frequency sensory neural hearing
loss and tinnitus caused by exposure to noise. Mr W will also need
a hearing aid sooner than other men his age.
BT admitted exposing Mr W to
excessive noise that was likely to cause damage to his hearing and
Hugh James successfully recovered £6,000.00 in damages for Mr
W.
Case study eight: Mr P
Hugh James has successfully
recovered £8,000.00 in compensation for Cardiff Telephone Engineer,
Mr P.
BT admitted exposing Mr P to
excessive noise that was likely to cause damage to his hearing.
During his work as a jointer, Mr P
was exposed to loud, high-pitched noise when using tone sets made
up of oscillators and amplifiers. He also frequently used noisy
generators and worked in the telephone exchanges.
Mr P had worked for BT for over 20
years when he began to notice problems with his hearing. He often
miss-hears conversations and his wife complains that he has the
television turned up far too loud. Social situations are
problematic and he has great difficulty hearing if there is
background noise.
Mr P had no idea his work at BT
would cause him significant permanent hearing loss and only linked
the two when he was advised by an ex-colleague that he could make a
claim.
Case study nine: Mr V
Former Surrey based BT
telephone engineer Mr V had suffered for many years with hearing
problems before realising that they were linked to his work for
BT.
Mr V worked for BT for 10
years as a Telephone Engineer frequently using tone set equipment
to tap and verify pairs of wires. Mr V was never told that using
the tone set equipment was dangerous and was never warned that it
could permanently damage his hearing.
After contacting Hugh James,
Mr V was diagnosed by our Medical Experts as suffering from noise
induced hearing loss and tinnitus. Mr V's need for a hearing aid
had been accelerated by approximately 19 years because of his
exposure to injurious levels of noise.
BT admitted exposing Mr V to
excessive noise that was likely to cause damage to his hearing and
Hugh James successfully secured £5,000.00 in damages for Mr
V.
Case study ten: Mr F
Hugh James have successfully
recovered £10,000 in compensation for Mr F, a former BT Telephone
Engineer from Cardiff.
BT admitted exposing Mr F to
excessive noise levels throughout his employment.
Mr F was employed by BT from 1965
until 1993 and was subject to a loud, high pitched noise when using
tone set equipment. This equipment was made up of a series of
oscillators and amplifiers. Mr F had no idea that by using this
equipment he would be causing permanent damage to his hearing.
Mr F first noticed his hearing
problems around 15 years ago. He found it difficult to follow any
conversations within a group of people, especially where there was
any background noise. His family have complained that he had the
television turned up extremely loud and he has also suffered with
Tinnitus, or ringing in the ears.
Mr F now wears a hearing aid and in
2008 was diagnosed with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Mr F
put up with his hearing problems for over ten years and was
completely unaware that they were related to his employment with BT
until 2008 when he saw a Hugh James advert regarding this issue
Return to the top of the page