What is energy mis-selling?
Energy mis-selling commonly arises where:
- a broker or intermediary arranged an energy supply contract for a business;
- the broker received commission from he energy supplier in connection with that arrangement;
- the business was not given full and clear information about how that commission worked; and
- the cost of that commission was added to the unit price the business ultimately paid for its energy
In many cases, businesses were told only that “commission exists”, without being told important details such as how much commission was charged, how it was calculated, or how it affected the price of the contract.
The courts have now made clear that simply mentioning the existence of commission is not necessarily enough. In appropriate cases, a business is entitled to sufficient information to give fully informed consent to the commission arrangement.
Recent legal developments
The legal position in this area has developed significantly. Recent Supreme Court decisions have confirmed that, where a broker or intermediary owes fiduciary duties to a customer, commission arrangements must be fully and transparently disclosed in order for informed consent to be obtained. The courts have made clear that partial or vague disclosure may not be sufficient, and that businesses may still have viable claims even where they understood, in general terms, that a broker was being paid, but were not given clear information about the material features of how that commission operated.
These developments have strengthened the position of businesses bringing claims relating to undisclosed or inadequately explained commission in energy contracts.