What are you looking for?

8 June 2020 | Comment | Article by Victoria Cannon

No fault divorces: ending the blame game and bringing divorce into the 21st century


The anticipated second reading on 8 June 2020 of the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill is a cause for hope among the majority of family lawyers who have long been in favour of no-fault divorce/dissolution options – recognising that the initial need for blame sets an unfortunate tone for the remainder of the case.

The Second Reading is normally the first opportunity for a Bill to be debated in either House – the Lords or the Commons – and is the stage where the overall principles of the Bill are considered. If the Bill passes its Second Reading, it moves on to the Committee Stage.

If it subsequently becomes law the need to blame will be removed, leaving many people in a much better place to deal with children and financial arrangements.

Many marriages and partnerships end simply because they end, not for a clearly identifiable reason. It is these relationships which will benefit the most from a change in the law, which allows a mutual divorce to proceed without anyone having to give reasons for it – other than “irretrievable breakdown”.

Whilst the proposed changes will lead to a minimum period of the divorce process being six months, that is six months during which the people separating can finalise the arrangements for any children and/or financial matters in many cases without the shadow of the “he/she/they did/said that” haunting them or the ability for one person to contest the divorce.

Finally, We’re one step closer to a divorce process which actively encourages cooperation from the start.

To speak to one of our team about your circumstance, please get in touch.

Author bio

Throughout her career spanning over 19 years in family law, Victoria Cannon has amassed extensive experience in advising business owners on safeguarding their enterprises during divorce proceedings and minimising disruption to their business.

Disclaimer: The information on the Hugh James website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. If you would like to ensure the commentary reflects current legislation, case law or best practice, please contact the blog author.

Contact one of our experts

Fill in the form and one of our experts will get in touch with you shortly.