What are you looking for?

Energy mis-selling claims

Many UK businesses entered into energy supply contracts through brokers or intermediaries, only to later discover that undisclosed or inadequately explained commission was built into the price they paid.

Recent court decisions, including judgments of the Supreme Court, have clarified when such commission arrangements are unlawful and when businesses may be entitled to bring claims. As a result, many businesses that were previously unsure whether they had a viable claim may now be able to take action.

Hugh James advises businesses across the UK on claims arising from mis-sold energy contracts, including claims involving undisclosed broker commission and inflated tariffs.


What is energy mis-selling?

Energy mis-selling commonly arises where:

  • a broker or intermediary arranged an energy supply contract for a business;
  • the broker received commission from he energy supplier in connection with that arrangement;
  • the business was not given full and clear information about how that commission worked; and
  • the cost of that commission was added to the unit price the business ultimately paid for its energy

In many cases, businesses were told only that “commission exists”, without being told important details such as how much commission was charged, how it was calculated, or how it affected the price of the contract.

The courts have now made clear that simply mentioning the existence of commission is not necessarily enough. In appropriate cases, a business is entitled to sufficient information to give fully informed consent to the commission arrangement.

Recent legal developments

The legal position in this area has developed significantly. Recent Supreme Court decisions have confirmed that, where a broker or intermediary owes fiduciary duties to a customer, commission arrangements must be fully and transparently disclosed in order for informed consent to be obtained. The courts have made clear that partial or vague disclosure may not be sufficient, and that businesses may still have viable claims even where they understood, in general terms, that a broker was being paid, but were not given clear information about the material features of how that commission operated.

These developments have strengthened the position of businesses bringing claims relating to undisclosed or inadequately explained commission in energy contracts.


Who may have a claim?

You may be able to bring an energy mis-selling claim if:

  • your business entered into an energy supply contract through a broker or intermediary;
  • the broker was paid commission by the supplier;
  • you were not given clear information about how that commission worked, including its impact on price; and
  • as a result, your business paid more for energy than it otherwise would have done.

Each case turns on its own facts. Not every commission arrangement is unlawful. We assess carefully what you were told at the time, what you understood, and how the contract was structured before advising whether a claim can be pursued.


How Hugh James can help

Hugh James is a leading UK law firm with extensive experience in complex financial and commercial disputes. We advise businesses of all sizes on energy mis-selling claims, supporting clients from an initial assessment of their position through to litigation where appropriate.

Our approach is careful and evidence-led, with a strong focus on commerciality and proportionality at every stage. We are transparent about prospects of success and risk, ensuring that clients are able to make informed decisions about how best to proceed.

In appropriate cases, we are able to act on a no win no fee basis, subject to an initial assessment of the merits of the claim and the suitability of funding arrangements.


What information will you need?

To assess your case, we will usually ask for:

  • copies of energy contract(s);
  • correspondence with brokers or suppliers about pricing or commission; and
  • information about when you first became aware that commission may have affected the price you paid.

If documents are missing, we can advise on next steps.


FAQs

Timing is important, but it is no longer as simple as looking only at the contract date.

In many cases, a six-year limitation period applies. However, the law recognises that limitation can be postponed where a business did not know, and could not reasonably have known, the material facts giving rise to the claim.

Recent court decisions clarify that the relevant facts are not simply that commission existed, but the material features of the commission arrangement itself. This means some claims relating to older contracts may still be brought, depending on when the business first discovered (or could reasonably have discovered) those facts.

We assess limitation carefully in every case and will advise candidly on the risks involved.

Not necessarily. In some cases, limitation may be postponed if the material facts about commission were not known and could not reasonably have been discovered earlier.

In suitable cases, yes. We will always assess the merits and risks first and explain funding options clearly before any claim is pursued.

In most cases, no. Claims usually relate to historic contracts.

Timescales vary depending on complexity and whether proceedings are required. We will discuss this once your case has been assessed.

Key contact

Neil Stockdale

Partner

Neil is head of the firm’s group actions and financial mis-selling teams, specialising in handling claims for financial mis-selling relating to energy contracts, pensions, investments and timeshares.

Next steps

We’re here to get things moving. Drop a message to one of our experts and we’ll get straight back to you.

Call us: 033 3016 2222

Message us